STfA
Symptom-to-path

Duplicate Platform Capabilities

Several teams build similar platform or enablement capabilities in parallel because shared solutions are not trustworthy or accessible enough.

archetypes

Tragedy of the Commons

The ruthless, locally rational self-interest of all parties destroys a shared architectural good for everyone.

Read article
Why this step:Makes the underlying pattern visible that keeps producing Duplicate Platform Capabilities in everyday work.
diagnostics

Dependency Mapping

A visualization of technical and organizational entanglements that exposes bottlenecks and dangerous coupling.

Read article
Why this step:Helps explain Duplicate Platform Capabilities not just descriptively, but in a structurally understandable way.
diagnostics

Boundary Critique

A method for exposing brutal blind spots by questioning what, and who, was actively excluded from an architecture decision.

Read article
Why this step:Adds a second perspective to the diagnosis so that side effects and limits become visible.
interventions

Boundary Design

The physical and logical redrawing of boundaries such as APIs and team structures to drastically reduce friction and handoffs across the system.

Read article
Why this step:Derives an initial intervention from the diagnosis that targets structure rather than only the symptom.
tooling

System Mapping Tools

An architecture decision tree. When do we reach for Miro, when Kumu, when Backstage, and when Vensim? A matrix against dangerous tooling dogmatism in mapping work.

Read article
Why this step:Supports the practical implementation and documentation of the path from Duplicate Platform Capabilities to change.

Ready for the workshop?

Copy this sequence as a structured agenda for your next architecture meeting or team workshop.